America’s Shape-Shifting Electorate

#214・
247

issues

Subscribe to our newsletter

By subscribing, you agree with Revue’s Terms of Service and Privacy Policy and understand that The Signal will receive your email address.

The Signal
Movement and Mirage
Is the U.S. Republican Party becoming a “multi-racial, working-class” coalition? Matt Grossmann assesses the evidence for a major political realignment.
Victor Freitas
Victor Freitas
Hispanic voters in America are “literally cascading into the Republican Party,” Donald Trump said last week, according to Fox News. Speaking on a call with Turning Point USA, a group that advocates for conservative values on American educational campuses, the former U.S. president also claimed the Republicans were “becoming the party of the worker and the party of just about everybody, frankly.” For all his characteristic hyperbole, Trump was alluding to something real: As The New York Times reports, based on the latest round of the regular survey it conducts in collaboration with Siena College, “Republicans appear to be making new inroads among nonwhite and working-class voters—perhaps especially Hispanic voters.” In fact, for the first time in the survey series, “Democrats had a larger share of support among white college graduates than among nonwhite voters.” It’s an especially remarkable finding, given that the Democratic Party had “won more than 70 percent of nonwhite voters while losing among white college graduates” in congressional elections just six years ago. The new data has reinforced an emerging view among political analysts at mainstream U.S. media outlets that—despite the traditionally common sense that the Republicans disproportionately represent the white and the wealthy, while the Democrats represent the non-white and the non-wealthy—the Republican Party is now becoming a “multi-racial, working-class” coalition. Is that really what’s happening?
Matt Grossmann is a professor of political science at Michigan State University, where he directs the Institute for Public Policy and Social Research. Grossmann thinks it’s true that the polarization of America’s white voters along educational lines is clear and likely to continue—and could plausibly spread to non-white voters, particularly Hispanics, over time. But the broader picture he sees is more complicated than the narrative of the Republican Party becoming a “multi-racial, working-class” coalition suggests. After all, the vast majority of non-whites still aren’t voting for Republican candidates, and some of the non–college-educated whites who are voting for them have high incomes, complicating the question of their “class.” Neither is there clear evidence on whether non-whites without college degrees are genuinely moving to the right. But there is evidence, Grossmann says, that more and more people across the American political spectrum are developing their party identities in relation to how they perceive the cultural influence of elite institutions—universities, the media, large corporations—that they associate with progressive values and progressive politics.
———
Graham Vyse: How do you see support for America’s two political parties shifting along educational lines?
Matt Grossmann: If you’re a white, college-educated voter in America today—or you live somewhere in the U.S. where you’re surrounded by white, college-educated voters—you’re likely to be trending toward the Democratic Party. The opposite’s true of white voters without college degrees. These trends predate Donald Trump’s rise to the presidency in 2016, but he certainly accelerated them. It used to be that white, college-educated voters were more likely to vote Republican.
Talking about voters in terms of their education is different from talking about them in terms of their broader “class,” which incorporates their education, income, and occupational status. It’s actually voters with high incomes and low levels of formal education who’re moving right; voters with higher levels of formal education but lower incomes—your quintessential graduate students—are moving left.
Education-based divisions among minority voters in the U.S. are still way more uncertain than some tend to assume. I looked at polling from before the 2020 election, and even when you have adequate samples of Hispanic-American, African-American, and Asian-American voters—and you’re able to differentiate across college-education levels—you don’t see consistent trends in which those voters split by education level. You just don’t see the clear education-based divide among them that you see among white voters. Now, there may have been a shift in 2020, but that hasn’t been sufficiently confirmed by survey work. There was a clear shift between 2016 and 2020 in the overall Hispanic vote, though, which moved toward Republicans while the rest of the country was moving toward the Democrats.
Vyse: What explains that?
Advertisement
Advertisement
Grossmann: Part of what we’re seeing is ideological sorting. White voters have sorted ideologically over a long time—there are virtually no white liberal Republicans or white conservative Democrats anymore—but the same thing hasn’t happened to the same degree among Hispanic voters. Many conservative Hispanic voters remain Democrats, for example. Yet in 2020, Hispanic voters were more likely to support Bernie Sanders in the Democratic presidential primary and Donald Trump in the general election than they were in 2016. Hispanics who’re more liberal were trending in a more liberal direction and Hispanics who’re more conservative were trending in a more conservative direction. This behavior seems to have been tied to the country of origin of the voter’s family: If they’d moved to the U.S. from a country with a left-leaning government, they were more likely to be trending conservative.
As Hispanics have moved toward the Republican Party, plenty have tried to explain the shift. I’m skeptical about explanations that have to do with Republicans’ political mobilization, or campaigns, or advertising, because we’ve seen this shift in places where those interventions didn’t happen.
Another explanation has to do with how Hispanic voters tend to respond to incumbent presidents: It seems that, in presidential elections prior to 2020, Hispanic voters tended to move toward the incumbent. But that year, they increased in their support for Republicans even where the candidates weren’t incumbents. The 2020 campaign also centered on different issues than the 2016 campaign did. Whereas immigration was extremely important in 2016, subjects like the pandemic, Covid restrictions, the economy, and crime were elevated in 2020. This may have contributed to Hispanic voters’ decision-making.
Giovanny Ayala
Giovanny Ayala
More from Matt Grossmann at The Signal:
In America, you still see a lot of high-income voters in the Republican Party, and you still see a lot of high-income politicians and other elites who are more concerned with economic than cultural issues. But there’s also a disconnect between elites and non-elites—within both parties: Republican donors are way to the right of their party’s voter base on the issue of taxes; Democratic donors are way to the left of their party’s voter base on the issues of abortion and guns. In other countries, these different interests would distribute themselves across a number of different political parties, but in the U.S., there are only two major parties, so the vast majority of voters end up in one or the other.”
The Democratic Party used to be very reliant on the idea that they represented lower-income people while Republicans represented rich people. In fact, if you asked Americans what they liked about Democrats, the number one thing they would say, for decades, was that the Democrats were the party of the working class or the middle class. The number-one thing Americans said they disliked about Republicans was that the Republicans were the party of the rich or big business. An important dimension of Democrats’ image is fading, because their party is increasingly the home of white, college-educated voters.
It’s important to acknowledge that conservatives are reacting to liberal trends in the culture. Things really are moving in a liberal direction in many ways; the country is diversifying and becoming more accepting of what used to be thought of as alternative lifestyles. It’s also becoming less religious and less white. Now, it might be difficult for progressives to understand how a Hispanic voter could worry about the country diversifying or becoming less culturally conservative—yet some conservative Hispanic voters indeed worry about them. Those sentiments simply aren’t off-limits for Hispanic people. It’s also worth noting that 2020 was the first year of the pandemic, and conservatives weren’t making up the fact that the government’s response involved telling people what to do—change their behavior in public, wear masks, close their businesses. And Hispanic small-business owners may well have responded negatively to that.”
The Signal explores urgent questions in current events around the world—to support it and for full access:
Did you enjoy this issue? Yes No
The Signal
The Signal @thesignal

Current affairs. Strange world.

In order to unsubscribe, click here.
If you were forwarded this newsletter and you like it, you can subscribe here.
Created with Revue by Twitter.