Two higher education veterans with unusually broad backgrounds have new books out that predict a profound transformation for the industry:
Levine previously was president of Columbia University’s Teachers College and held several positions at Harvard University’s Graduate School of Education, among other roles. He and Van Pelt say colleges and universities are in the
early phases of an upheaval that will rival that of the Industrial Revolution, although the pace of change will be faster.
Every college will need to adapt, he predicts, as the lines between colleges, industry, and cultural agencies blur.
“Traditional higher education is undoubtedly facing mounting competition from a mushrooming number of new content providers, and students have dramatically more choices—often at lower cost—in how, when, and where they learn,” Levine and Van Pelt write. They say students will receive instruction and certification online from organizations as varied as Google, Procter and Gamble, alibaba, Calvin Klein, L’Oréal, PBS, and the Museum of Natural History.
The dominance of degrees will diminish, they write, while nondegree certifications and “just-in-time” education will increase in status and value. These shifts would be chaotic, creating challenges as well as opportunities.
Community colleges and regional public universities will be disrupted by competition from alternative providers, they write. And the predicted upheaval could cause greater educational inequity and social division by “establishing two separate and unequal models of higher education.”
Rick Seltzer of
Higher Ed Dive asked Levine whether he worries about students not encountering new ideas when they are better able to personalize their education.
“What you’re describing scares the hell out of me,” Levine said. “Yes, it’s an enormous possibility that will happen. We can already see it in news.”
Levine told me viable
stackable credential pathways, which currently are rare, could help diminish the tracking problem by giving lower-income students a better chance to earn degrees. But he added a caveat, saying that even with real stackability, the “prestige of the authorizer of the stack will matter, particularly if the stack can be converted to a degree.”
Colleges are remarkably durable institutions.
And plenty of dire predictions about the industry’s future have fizzled as higher education iterates and absorbs upstarts.
Yet many experts think a substantial shift is underway.
Dan Greenstein, chancellor of Pennsylvania’s State System of Higher Education, which
is merging six of 14
universities, this week
wrote about the conclusions from Levine, Van Pelt, and others. He cited the
growing emphasis on job readiness by traditional colleges and universities, an expansion of experiential learning and nondegree credentials, and the potential for LinkedIn’s Learning Hub and other mass-market platforms to encroach significantly on the near monopoly degree-granting institutions have had over postsecondary education.
“The transformation of our nation’s universities will proceed incrementally, then all at once,” Greenstein wrote.
‘The Educational Underground’: Smith’s book features the stories of a wide range of working learners to make the case for a broader acceptance of the knowledge and skills people gain outside traditional college. Smith, a former U.S. representative, was the founding president of the Community College of Vermont and California State University at Monterey Bay.
Postsecondary options for working learners will increase dramatically while becoming more affordable, Smith tells me. This could open up possibilities for many of the millions of Americans who cannot access the “opportunity ladder” of higher education as it is currently structured. And it will put more pressure on traditional colleges.
“Adjusting at scale to the newly recognized needs of employers and adult learners will prove more difficult, academically and economically, for traditional institutions than many people realize,” he says.
Smith suggests several ways for policy makers and higher education leaders to help working learners have their knowledge and skills recognized:
- Instead of doubling the value of federal Pell Grants, put that money into lifelong learning accounts that are income-referenced.
- Stop using time (four years for a bachelor’s degree) as a determinant of learning progress and divorce “academic progress” as traditionally defined from financial aid.
- Develop and fund competence equivalents that allow for scaled assessment of prior learning for both academic recognition and employment qualification.
- Focus on personal dispositions, as well as knowledge and skills, as critical components to success in life and at work.
The Kicker: When asked about arguments of skeptics of online college benefits for front-line workers, including those who say these credential programs aren’t really college, Smith says,
“They are defending a ‘castle’ that an increasing number of people—employers, learners, and educators—don’t want to storm. Just as digitization has flipped the music and movie industries, so will it redefine how education happens, where, and for whom.”