View profile

We're losing the fight against sexual harassment

From the editorThis issue, in recognition of International Women's Day and the distance we still need


March 8 · Issue #33 · View online
Your weekly wrap of national affairs, society, culture and politics, published by UnionsACT.

From the editor
This issue, in recognition of International Women’s Day and the distance we still need to travel to bridge the gender divide, we look at the Australian Human Rights Commission’s new report on sexual harassment in the workplace and the role the changing nature of work plays. We also celebrate the Tasmanian government’s global leadership on renewable energy and lament the nearly departed news service AAP.
And please remember that SundayFocus can only survive if those of you who can afford to send us a few dollars every month. If you can spare the money, please consider subscribing or perhaps buying a Gift Solidarity Subscription for a friend. Click here to find all of our subscription offers.
Enjoy the issue!
Guy Mosel, editor

We're losing the fight against sexual harassment
by Guy Mosel
Photo by Duncan Cumming | Flickr
Photo by Duncan Cumming | Flickr
In 2018, with the #MeToo movement in full swing and women demanding that rich and powerful men be held to account for their harassment and abuse, Sex Discrimination Commissioner Kate Jenkins launched a landmark inquiry into sexual harassment in Australian workplaces.
The “Respect@Work: Sexual Harassment National Inquiry Report” was released during the week, and it reveals that Australian laws need a dramatic overhaul to protect workers from sexual harassment.
In her foreword to the report Ms Jenkins writes that Australia has dropped the ball and now “lags behind other countries in preventing and responding to sexual harassment”, describing the current legal and regulatory system as “simply no longer fit for purpose”.
“I have been devastated by the experiences of sexual harassment within workplaces I have heard about through this inquiry, the harms suffered by victims and the cost to the economy,” Ms Jenkins says.
“In this report, I have recommended a new model that improves the coordination, consistency and clarity between the anti-discrimination, employment and work health and safety legislative schemes.”
Thirty-five years since the introduction of 1984’s Sex Discrimination Act, sexual harassment in Australian workplaces remains a massive problem. While years of awareness-raising and the efforts of movements like #MeToo and #TimesUp have culminated in many high-profile scalps, the reality is that sexual harassment remains an insidious feature of workplaces across the country.
In fact, according to the Human Rights Commission’s (HRC) 2018 national survey, Everyone’s Business, workplace sexual harassment is actually increasing, with a third of all workers – including two in every five women – targeted in the previous five years.
The survey found that 85 per cent of women and 56 per cent of men had suffered sexual harassment int the workplace in their lives, the most common forms being offensive comments or jokes; inappropriate physical contact; and unwelcome touching, hugging, cornering or kissing.
The HRC notes that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander workers, young workers under 30, LGBTQI workers, workers with disability and workers from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds are especially vulnerable and experience a higher incidence of harassment.
The changing workplace
There are many cultural, economic and technological reasons why we’re losing the fight against sexual harassment. Among those is the changing makeup of the workplace and the nature of work arrangements.
In 1984, when the Sex Discrimination Act was passed, 94 per cent of all working men were employed full-time; now it’s 80 per cent. Over the same period the workforce participation rate for women soared, but only 56 per cent of women work in full-time roles.
Temporary, on-call work, contracting and other non-standard and precarious employment arrangements are now increasingly common after decades of neoliberal assault on working conditions and the relentless drive towards casualisation.
The Commission heard that people working in such vulnerable situations are often unable or unwilling to report instances of harassment. For one thing, many have never met or might not even know who their boss is, while they are also more likely to be “reluctant to complain to avoid their contracts not being renewed or being assigned fewer hours of work”. This makes them much more likely to be targets of harassment.
Declining union membership is also a contributing factor, with the Commission finding low awareness among workers of their rights, combined with “less collective action and support between workers, and less representative complaints and advocacy by trade unions”.
Ms Jenkins says that although it’s up to governments and authorities to bring Australian laws and regulations in line with global best practice, every Australian had a role to play in eliminating sexual harassment.
“Sexual harassment is not a women’s issue: it is a societal issue, which every Australian, and every Australian workplace, can contribute to addressing,” she says.
“Workplace sexual harassment is not inevitable. It is not acceptable. It is preventable.”
Read more
Despite challenges to their influence in the workplace Australian unions work hard every day to protect workers and respond to incidents of sexual harassment. Click here to find out about Hospo Voice’s “Respect is the Rule” campaign, a response to the shockingly high rate of harassment experienced by young women working in hospitality. And read the ACTU’s joint statement with 100 other organisations calling for a coordinated government response to “create sexual harassment-free workplaces”. 
The Respect@Work report notes that the use of non-disclosure agreements by businesses to protect their financial and reputational interests contributes to “a culture of silence”. Read one woman’s story and find out more about the issue here.
With Harvey Weinstein found guilty of rape last month the #MeToo movement still has momentum but no clear direction. The New York Times has a good analysis here.
The week in review
👍🏽 Apple Isle goes for climate gold
Tasmania’s Liberal government has made its federal cousins look foolish (which, at this point, is the lowest bar in Australian political history) with a plan to generate 200 per cent of its energy needs from renewables by 2040. Premier Peter Gutwein said his government would release an updated Renewable Energy Action Plan, driven by hydro, wind and solar energy production, to ensure Tasmania remained the “renewable energy powerhouse” of Australia. The premier bragged that Tasmania had “the lowest per capita emissions of all states and territories" and was one of “the lowest net emitters of carbon dioxide on the planet”.
Are you listening, Angus Talyor?
👎🏽 AAP axed
As Glenn Dyer [$] in Crikey writes, “News Corp and Nine killed the backbone of Australian media this week by announcing the axing of Australian Association Press (AAP) – changing the structure and future of Australian journalism forever.” He’s not wrong. The death of AAP is a massive blow to news reporting in Australia and leaves the ABC as the only media organisation able to reliably and fairly gather and report on news to any scale. Monash University’s analysis of the likely impacts on Australian journalism is worth reading.
👍🏽 Bernie can still win
“In less than seventy-two hours, Sanders has gone from clear favourite to anxious underdog,” writes Matt Karp in Jacobin. It’s been a deflating week if you’re a fan of Bernie and his movement. But Karp says the cranky senator from Vermont can still overcome the establishment forces aligned against him if he can convince voters that he’s a safer choice than Biden, a “candidate whose political career is an extended advertisement for Beltway malfeasance, and whose only real asset – a kind of musty aura of the Obama years – is considerably diminished by his inability to speak in complete sentences”.
Liz “Capitalist To My Bones” Warren dropping out ought to help Bernie’s chances, but don’t count on her endorsing him (although if she was serious about seeing her own political agenda implemented she would).
👎🏽 Corona chaos
It says something about Australia (although I don’t know what) that the first manifestation of the coronavirus panic was a run on toilet paper. As amusing and distracting as that is, there are bigger issues to contemplate, namely the health and safety of our most vulnerable and maintaining a functioning society in the face of a pandemic. With the global economy beginning to tank, and our own already in dire straits, there are calls for the government to embark on a GFC-era Rudd-style stimulus program. A massive investment in overstretched health services and an increase in Newstart would be a step in the right direction.
The invisible city: how a homeless man built a life underground
Michael Bloomberg doesn’t deserve to be a billionaire – no one does
For your bookshelf
Solved! by Andrew Wear
Cardinal: The Rise and Fall of George Pell, by Louise Milligan
"What a unionist looks like" t-shirt
Did you enjoy this issue?
If you don't want these updates anymore, please unsubscribe here.
If you were forwarded this newsletter and you like it, you can subscribe here.
Powered by Revue
Authorised A White for UnionsACT. 11 London Circuit, Canberra ACT 2601. Read our Privacy Statement here: