View profile

Do you ever think the world has gone mad? The KGB called it AGITPROP.

Do you ever think the world has gone mad? The KGB called it AGITPROP.
By Secular Soul • Issue #1 • View online
Does it sometimes seem that the world sees things differently to you?
Does it seem that being a good person isn’t enough?
Does it seem that even the most innocuous topic is the subject of controversy?
Do fairly benign things appear to offend certain people, and you’re not sure why?
No, relax, your maple syrup isn’t racist.
A KGB operative warned this feeling was due to AGITPROP.

I was in a bar near Harvard Square when I first heard about AgitProp. In front of me was a former KGB propaganda operative who had defected to the west and disclosed how the Soviet Union funded political groups to sow confusion.
A portmanteau of Agitation and Propaganda, AgitProp’s goal is to shape public policy by manufacturing conflict, creating the illusion of consensus, and marginalising dissent.
It does this by agitating within the discourse on every topic, thus creating the expectation that some people in the conversation are “good”, and some people are “bad”. It subverts discussion, and turns it into a trial. The agitator then performs an appeal to authority, citing authority figures from clusters of self referential academic fields. These will be fields you’ve never heard of before, but sound legitimate. They will all cite each other, using their own buzzwords, and will attempt to discredit, silence or deplatform anyone outside of their bubble. A modern alternative to this is the appeal to institutions like celebrity and corporation. (“Ben and Jerry’s agree! There must be critical mass”)
It then establishes clear camps of those who are “good”, and those who are “evil”, by way of slurs, demonisation and false equivalencies. At this point they have their champions, as people fall over one another to wear the newly minted crown of virtue.
Then, through the fear of ostracism from the group, it manufactures the illusion of consensus. People are left with the choice of either siding with those who are doing the slandering, staying silent or being slandered themselves. The illusion of consensus leads one to assume that it’s not just the slanderer, but their friends and their families who feel this way. Their apprehensive silence appears to echo this sentiment.
Occasionally one may be let back into the fold by way of public capitulation, or via struggle sessions, which simultaneously confirm their allegiance to the ideology, and reinforce the notion of “moral rightness” and universal consensus to the ideology.
That consensus DOESN’T actually exist. It’s generally a small group of far right or far left agitators working to shepherd free thought into the dark channels of their narrow political rhetoric. These conversations appear organic, but once you can identify them, they all essentially follow the same structure laid out by the 20th century designers of AgitProp tactics.
One way I’ve found to identify AgitProp is by asking the agitator to offer a specific and actionable demand. If they aren’t able to offer anything you can act upon, then they aren’t interested in solving the issue and are just interested in using your emotions as a vehicle for their propaganda. This is generally true whether they’re the agitator, or just another hapless node.
Traditionally, the ultimate aim of AgitProp is to ensure continued and exaggerated unrest within a society, ultimately necessitating some form of violent revolution - thus evolutionary/incremental/actionable efforts are torn down in favour of heightened agitation. It’s why we can’t seem to get action on basic things like access to education in rural Australia, or a carbon tax. These actionable items represent, to the agitator, a move AWAY from the point of revolutionary criticality.
It’s very successful, it’s used by both sides of the political spectrum, and it makes up 90% of the news and politics.
As I ordered another vodka, I asked the KGB operative what the solution was to these tactics. He laughed and said it was simple -
DON’T BE A SUCKER
The US counter propaganda team even made a newsreel to teach the public:
Don't Be a Sucker - 1947
Don't Be a Sucker - 1947
Did you enjoy this issue?
Secular Soul

Paul Dabrowa, an artificial intelligence and social media expert specialising in the operational underpinnings of persuasion and related psychology. Dabrowa is presently the co-founder of biome.ai, a company which uses artificial intelligence to develop treatments for disease using the human microbiome. However his academic background, both at Melbourne University and Harvard Kennedy School, saw him interviewing former Nazis and KGB operatives to develop a neuroscience model of how totalitarian propaganda works, and he has advised government and the military on these issues ever since. 

If you don't want these updates anymore, please unsubscribe here.
If you were forwarded this newsletter and you like it, you can subscribe here.
Powered by Revue