View profile

New rule: No more DM-ing

New rule: No more DM-ing
By Niall Maher • Issue #44 • View online
“Knowing is not enough; we must apply. Willing is not enough we must do.”
- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

New rule: No more DM-ing (at work, at least).
At first glance, direct messaging (DMs) may seem like an efficient way to communicate at work. After all, it’s just like texting but without the hassle of remembering someone’s phone number.
When people communicate via DMs, they lose the opportunity to share a question with a broader audience (and the hope of getting a quick answer if the person they message is busy).
Now, what happens when you have to ask the same question to someone else, and they need to ask someone else for information?
This is where things can get a little complicated.
This image from StackOverflow gives a simple visual for how communicating directly with a peer can quickly become a complex problem when it comes to asking questions and sharing knowledge.
Diagram of connections when working with people.
Diagram of connections when working with people.
With a team of just 14 people, we get 91 communication lines.
If you have ever played the game “Chinese whispers” or “Telephone,” you will know that our messages with just a handful of people can become utterly divergent from our original conversation.
The solution to this is using open communication streams.
The Benefits of Open Communication Streams
Open communication streams have several benefits over direct messaging.
DMs are disruptive because they break the flow of work. When you’re in the middle of a task, and you get a DM, it’s natural to want to stop what you’re doing to respond.
With an open communication stream, everyone can see the conversation, so you’re less likely to be interrupted, and if you are deep in work it is likely someone else could help.
It also breaks the flow for the person who sent the DM because they now have to wait for a response. 
And if that response isn’t forthcoming, it can lead to frustration and even resentment.
Second, open communication streams promote transparency. When everyone can see the conversation, there’s more room for communication and understanding.
Finally, open communication streams encourage collaboration. Seeing how others contribute to the conversation, you can jump in and offer your help easily.
The main reason I dislike DMs is mostly because of the silos of knowledge they can create.
How to Create Open and Effective Communication Streams
By having an open conversation on team channels on SlackDiscordGitHub, or Microsoft Teams, you now start creating a knowledge base that you can share with people who encounter similar problems or ask how you got to a conclusion.
These tools allow you to create different channels for different topics, so you can easily find the information you need without being bombarded with notifications.
Direct messaging may seem like an efficient way to communicate at work, but there are several reasons why it’s not the best option.
Direct messaging is not transparent and is inefficient as it can lead to bottlenecks.
We all know bottlenecks are bad so let’s get rid of this one easily.
App/Site of the week 🗓
What I've been reading 📖
End ❤️
Is there something you would like help with, or do you have an idea for some content I should write?
I know I said no DM-ing in this issue, but for you and your pretty face, I will make an exception…
Well, then reply to this email! I’m always looking for ways to deliver maximum value to YOU!
That’s all for this week, have a great week ahead, and I’ll chat with you next week! 👋
You can always reply to this email to say hello or get in touch. 💌
Follow me on LinkedIn or Twitter.
Did you enjoy this issue?
Niall Maher

A curation of great articles, thoughts on running a tech startup, personal growth and building stuff that people love to use.

In order to unsubscribe, click here.
If you were forwarded this newsletter and you like it, you can subscribe here.
Powered by Revue