By Iskander Smit

Iskander Smit - Issue #68





Subscribe to our newsletter

By subscribing, you agree with Revue’s Terms of Service and Privacy Policy and understand that Target_is_New will receive your email address.

Iskander Smit - Issue #68
By Iskander Smit • Issue #68 • View online
Amsterdam, Delft, August 27, 2018
Hi all.
It was some time ago I send this update. Which was not as intended, but losing a rhythm is easier than keeping one…
Since the last edition my daily routine changed also quite a bit. I mentioned my activities as visiting professor at TU Delft and the start of the research program PACT together with prof Elisa Giaccardi. All on that can be found on the website
I also mentioned my intensifying research activities; I decided to take the challenge and opportunity to start a PhD within the program, supported by my employer Which means my activities shift from a 1 day academic role to a 4 day role. I will be keep heading LABS as innovation director, but the activities will focus more on fundamental research now than applied research for sure.
Next to that I’m also still active organising team-member of ThingsCon conference and other activities, and we will try to co-organise a couple of Behavior Design AMS meetups and Tech Solidarity NL. Find more on the coming activities at the end of this update.
That as introduction after the silence with the newsletter. I hope to keep up with a weekly update cycle from now. I plan to share only a couple of articles and they are probably more related to the domain of the research. 

Sidewalk Labs & Social Credits
Two articles on the new initiative of Sidewalk Labs in Toronto are interesting to compare to developments in China. It may feel like a stretch but I think it is interesting to compare the discussion on the data collection in Sidewalk and that of the Chinese government. 
Sidewalk Labs a new development on Toronto’s quay that is a collaboration project between government of Toronto and Google
Sidewalk’s vision for Quayside — as a place populated by self-driving vehicles and robotic garbage collectors, where the urban fabric is embedded with cameras and sensors capable of gleaning information from the phone in your pocket — certainly sounds Orwellian. Yet the company contends that the data gathered from fully wired urban infrastructure is needed to refine inefficient urban systems and achieve ambitious innovations like zero-emission energy grids. — 
Another article zooms in on the role of governing data and creating a democratic structure. “Our mission is really to use technology to redefine urban life in the twenty-first century.” 
In this article the focus is on the governing structures and challenges and the role of the buy-in by the public.
Data collection, privacy and surveillance are at the centre of discussion around Sidewalk Toronto. Consistently, however, these discussions begin with “what will you do with my data?” rather than with “why do you need my data at all?” It’s as if surrendering data to the private sector is required. It’s not.
The discussion focuses on the role of Google here extracting and using the data in a business interest. Let’s make a bold connection to what happens in China. The highly surveillance culture and the new social crediting systems are analysed in the role it plays for a new kind of democracy in this article
In January, when Xi addressed the nation on television, the bookshelves on either side of him contained both classic titles such as Das Kapital and a few new additions, including two books about artificial intelligence: Pedro Domingos’s The Master Algorithm and Brett King’s Augmented: Life in the Smart Lane.
It made me think on the strategies from Roman times on bread and circuses. The system is designed for surveillance but it seems sometimes that the Chinese have not the biggest issue with that concept, as their wealth is increasing. However I don’t believe that completely true talking to Chinese students, there is a balancing act with having enough benefits on the one hand and knowing exactly what is possible to control people. I am not defending or hailing the system at all, it is de-humanising people. 
Getting back to Sidewalk Labs and the Silicon Valley strategies. I have to think on the ideas of Elon Musk for a hyper-direct democracy in Mars. Replacing the representative democracy concept we have now with direct influence. That is in fact the same as a Chinese model, only -hopefully- with a different starting point and end state. It is the context for Sidewalk Labs.
It all does well connect to my research topic, and the Things as Citizens, one aspect of it. What are the consequences of adding the new technology to the city, and especially done by a party as Google? It is not only about making a city smart with sensors or other data cloud-connection, it is adding a new player in the city. In the Sidewalk Labs the autonomous vehicles play an important role. Who is governing those? I think that aspect is an interesting extra layer that is not yet taken into account in these discussions on data extraction and surveillance. 
ThingsCon just published today a new edition of the Responsible IoT publication. I contribute with an overview on the research on Cities of Things and Things as Citizens. You can read it here. Don’t forget the check all the other articles.
Other interesting reads
And some activities in October and beyond
Conference 2018 - ThingsCon
Did you enjoy this issue?
Iskander Smit

Weekly updates on human-tech interactions in robotics, ai, autonomous vehicles, cities, and beyond.
I am working @_Structural as a design director and chair Cities of Things foundation, co-organizing @ThingsCon.

In order to unsubscribe, click here.
If you were forwarded this newsletter and you like it, you can subscribe here.
Powered by Revue