View profile

Twitter says it won't ban Trump

Today's top story: It took long enough, but Twitter finally has a coherent statement about its stance
January 5 · Issue #57 · View online
The Interface
Today’s top story: It took long enough, but Twitter finally has a coherent statement about its stance toward banning President Donald Trump: it won’t. Late Friday afternoon, the company put up a blog post speaking to the value of keeping Trump’s tweets visible for all to see — without ever mentioning him by name.
Twitter is here to serve and help advance the global, public conversation. Elected world leaders play a critical role in that conversation because of their outsized impact on our society.
Blocking a world leader from Twitter or removing their controversial Tweets, would hide important information people should be able to see and debate. It would also not silence that leader, but it would certainly hamper necessary discussion around their words and actions.
If you read the newsletter this week, you know this lines up with my own thinking.
Consider how many options Trump would have if he were banned from Twitter. He could relay his tweets through proxies, either in writing or by dictating them. He could post his thoughts on Facebook or another social network, where an infinite number of bots would screenshot them and repost them. And even if he and all his proxies were banned by every social network, both current and future, he would still be able to call a network news conference more or less whenever he wanted. 
As I mentioned in my story today, Twitter holds out the possibility that it could still take action against a Trump tweet, or even Trump’s Twitter account  — on purpose, even!
We review Tweets by leaders within the political context that defines them, and enforce our rules accordingly.
Left unsaid is that Twitter rules change weekly and are enforced erratically. But the point remains: just because Twitter hasn’t taken down a Trump tweet yet doesn’t mean it won’t eventually. 
In the meantime, I’m glad Twitter has drawn some clearer lines around its thinking when it comes to Trump. Even if can’t bring itself to say his name. 

We’ve been told we’re living in a post-truth age. Don’t believe it.
Internet falls for Trump-'Gorilla Channel' parody
the gorilla channel thing is a joke
Wow, this extract from Wolff’s book is a shocking insight into Trump’s mind:
6:07 PM - 4 Jan 2018
I’ve Studied the Trump-Fox Feedback Loop for Months. It’s Crazier Than You Think.
The lobbying group for Amazon, Facebook, Google and others is joining the battle to restore net neutrality
Snap’s unusual structure led to a series of breakthroughs — but could it break the company?
Snap shares fall after Cowen downgrades, predicts 30% slide
Jake Paul Caught Rapping N-Word Twice in Leaked Video
And finally: everyone profiles Quiz Daddy
On most days we are blessed with, at most, one profile of HQ Trivia host and Sweetgreen enthusiast Scott Rogowsky. Today the content stars aligned and we got three, as media outlets all over Lower Manhattan try to recapture some of that old Taylor Lorenz magic. Let’s see what we’ve got:
Encounter: Playing Bar Trivia With HQ’s Scott
Quiz Daddy Show: An Open-Mic Night With ‘HQ’ Host Scott Rogowsky
How HQ Trivia Became the Best Worst Thing on the Internet
I appreciate all the great work is doing on their Scott Rogowsky profiles, but there is still a lot of work left to be done. Who is Scott’s girlfriend? What is the vibe at his parents’ house, where he lives? Can the next profiler please go apartment hunting with him?
Talk to me
Questions? Comments? Cuddle puddles? 
Did you enjoy this issue?
If you don't want these updates anymore, please unsubscribe here
If you were forwarded this newsletter and you like it, you can subscribe here
Powered by Revue