View profile

Big Revolution - On background

Revue
 
Welcome to Monday's Big Revolution. Here's to a productive week ahead. – Martin
 
September 10 · Issue #197 · View online
Big Revolution
Welcome to Monday’s Big Revolution. Here’s to a productive week ahead.
Martin

Big things you need to know today
The big thought
Apple's 'spaceship' campus. Credit: Carles Rabada on Unsplash
On background
A paragraph in a 9to5Mac story on Friday caught my eye, as it highlighted one of the worst problems with PR in the tech industry.
“We understand Apple’s view is that the app doesn’t defeat sandboxing, since the intention is to ensure users are in control of what apps can and can’t do, and it is users who granted permission. That said, macOS Mojave does increase sandboxing protections, so that even if a user grants permission for total access, it will still protect sensitive information like Safari history and cookies.”
Where did this information come from? If you’ve not dealt with tech company PR departments, you might think the journalist in question got the information from a source within Apple, speaking secretly. After all, surely if they’d got it from Apple’s PR department, it would be in the form of an official quote, right?
But no - this information will almost certainly have been given to 9to5Mac by Apple PR ‘on background.’ Apple will have said “We’ve got nothing to say officially, but on background…” and then given the information in that quote above in almost identical wording to what 9to5Mac published.
Why do they do this? By shying away from giving an exact quote, Apple is absolving itself of any embarrassment (and repercussions in the press and on the stock market) if it turns out its approach to the issue at hand was wrong. It would just look like 9to5Mac made a mistake in its reporting.
And given that Apple rarely makes any comment at all on press stories, journalists are just happy to have got information 'on background.’
This isn’t unique to Apple and 9to5Mac, it’s rife throughout the tech industry and the tech press. It confuses readers about who is exactly saying what, and why. The only reason PR people in tech do it is because they can get away with it – some information is better than none for reporters, after all.
And if it also makes a reporter look like they did some deeper reporting than they did (when in some cases they don’t have the time, resources or experience to do this) then that’s an added bonus.
Only a handful of publications have the clout to be able to insist on getting on-the-record quotes in place of 'on background’ information (mainly some of the big US newspapers), but at least if you know to look for these 'our understanding is…’ sentences, followed by something that sounds very much like it came from a PR department, you can understand a bit more about what might really be going on.
One big read
This beautiful map shows everything that powers an Amazon Echo, from data mines to lakes of lithium This beautiful map shows everything that powers an Amazon Echo, from data mines to lakes of lithium
“A huge map, two meters high and five meters across… traces the systems used to power one of the most complex products of the modern day: an AI-powered gadget, specifically, an Amazon Echo. It’s a mess of branching lines in stark black and white, and looks more like the schematics of a nuclear reactor than an everyday gadget.”
One big tweet
This tweet only works if you click through and view the GIF that accompanies it.
Benedict Evans
“I run the innovation lab. It’s like we’re a startup, but inside a big company.” https://t.co/q3m7XysPNn
10:32 PM - 9 Sep 2018
That’s all for today...
See you tomorrow for a weekend edition of Big Revolution. In the meantime, don’t forget:
  • If you have any feedback on Big Revolution, you can always hit ‘reply’ to this email
  • If you like this newsletter, share this link with your friends and suggest they subscribe
  • If you want to help support this newsletter, why not do what around 5% of subscribers do, and become a member for $5 per month. Think of it like buying me a coffee every month for sending you all these emails. More details
Did you enjoy this issue?
 
Become a member for $5 per month
Don’t miss out on the other issues by Martin SFP Bryant
You can manage your subscription here
If you were forwarded this newsletter and you like it, you can subscribe here
Powered by Revue