View profile

Big Revolution - Facing up to police facial recognition

Revue
 
Welcome to Tuesday's Big Revolution. I would have had it with you a bit earlier but I stupidly walked
 
December 18 · Issue #296 · View online
Big Revolution
Welcome to Tuesday’s Big Revolution. I would have had it with you a bit earlier but I stupidly walked two miles this morning while zonged out with man-flu. I needed a bit of time to recalibrate!
Martin

Big things you need to know today
  • New malware that pulls its instructions from coded messages in memes on Twitter has been discovered. It’s like something out of Mr Robot.
The big thought
A sign warning about a facial recognition test in London. Credit: Liberty / Twitter
Facing up to police facial recognition
Privacy advocates are rightfully raising questions about a police test of facial recognition on the streets of London this week. Not least because the tech isn’t particularly effective in spotting criminals while simultaneously having the potential to invade the public’s right to privacy as they go about their day.
To quote the Register:
The force has employed the tech – which scans people’s faces against a list of individuals of interest to the police – on numerous other occasions, including at the Notting Hill Carnival and a shopping centre in Stratford, east London.
This time, the tech will be attached to vans and run for eight hours on each day as the Met said it needed to put the tech through its paces for a longer time period.
However, use in a live environment is controversial because of poor success rates and a lack of governance and regulation.
In May, a Freedom of Information request from Big Brother Watch showed the Met’s facial recog had a 98 per cent false positive rate.
The group has now said that a subsequent request found that 100 per cent of the so-called matches since May have been incorrect.
I’m not aware of any evidence that other facial recognition systems deployed by law enforcement around the world (and apparently Taylor Swift) are any better. China trumpets the success of its system, but maybe that’s just a placebo effect – tell people it works and they’ll be too scared to break the law.
Honestly, for all our objections, it’s very likely facial recognition will be just another part of law enforcement in a decade or so. Just as we quickly forgot the security cameras that follow us around city centres, there will quickly be enough support to keep facial recognition in use if it catches a widely hated criminal or three.
Whether data protection law can keep up is another question. But think about it – if Google and Facebook know everywhere you’ve been thanks to their apps, law enforcement squads are probably going to expect to have access to similar data as standard soon enough.
One big read
How Britain grapples with nationalist dark web How Britain grapples with nationalist dark web
10 Downing Street has a unit devoted to talking extremist propaganda. But is this material skewing the prime minister’s view about what the British public really want from Brexit?
One big tweet
Dance moves in Fortnite have raised previously unexplored copyright questions.
nilay patel
These Fortnite dance lawsuits create wild policy questions: Should individual dance moves be licensed like music samples? Should a wedding video on YouTube get DMCA’d bc people in it are flossing? Can Michael Jackson’s estate charge Jaden Smith every time he moonwalks on stage?
11:20 PM - 17 Dec 2018
That’s all for today...
Back tomorrow with more. Enjoy this newsletter? Please share it and encourage a friend or colleague to subscribe.
Want to keep receiving Big Revolution over Christmas and New Year? Become a member here. The last normal edition for all subscribers before January is this coming Friday.
Did you enjoy this issue?
 
Become a member for $5 per month
Don’t miss out on the other issues by Martin SFP Bryant
You can manage your subscription here
If you were forwarded this newsletter and you like it, you can subscribe here
Powered by Revue