View profile

Big Revolution - 21st century amorality

Revue
 
Welcome to Monday's newsletter. There's a lot of politics in today's edition, because now more than e
 
June 29 · Issue #758 · View online
Big Revolution
Welcome to Monday’s newsletter. There’s a lot of politics in today’s edition, because now more than ever, politics and technology are inextricably intertwined.
— Martin from Big Revolution

Big things you need to know today
  • This year’s iPhones may come without headphones or a charger. Often accurate analyst Ming-Chi Kuo says removing the accessories will mean Apple can sell the new 5G phones at the same price as last year’s models, despite the more expensive components inside.
  • Parler, a kind of right-wing Twitter clone, is on the up. It says it’s seen 50% user growth in one week, up to 1.5m. At a time when some on the right feel their free speech is being impinged by Twitter’s new confidence in enforcing rules, Parler is there to take them, but will they get bored without left-wing folk to spar against?
  • PizzaGate is back. The discredited anti-Clinton conspiracy theory is seeing renewed engagement, showing just how much some people distrust the media.
The big thought
Credit: Alex Haney on Unsplash
Credit: Alex Haney on Unsplash
21st century amorality
The Washington Post has an interesting [paywalled] article about Mark Zuckerberg’s relationship with Donald Trump, and what this says about Facebook as a company.
It’s an in-depth read that shows how Facebook briefly struggled behind the scenes to get Trump to delete his recent post about sending the military in to deal with protesters. It obviously failed, but while Twitter then took action against the post, Facebook did everything it could to justify keeping it up.
The article uses leaked documents to show that what we already felt was true was indeed an official policy: Facebook has done everything it can to avoid the ire of conservative critics, things that many may consider immoral:
Facebook has constrained its efforts against false and misleading news, adopted a policy explicitly allowing politicians to lie, and even altered its news feed algorithm to neutralize claims that it was biased against conservative publishers, according to more than a dozen former and current employees and previously unreported documents obtained by The Washington Post. One of the documents shows it began as far back as 2015, when as a candidate Trump posted a video calling for a ban of Muslims entering the United States. Facebook’s executives declined to remove it, setting in motion an exception for political discourse.
But while it would be easy to decry Facebook as an immoral company for taking these steps, but I think it’s more useful to think of it as amoral. The company doesn’t view Trump and his fellow travellers as inherently ‘good’ or 'bad,’ and it doesn’t take steps like those above because it necessarily believes in them. Instead, it simply does whatever it needs to to maintain its current place in the world. It sets its sail to follow the political winds without ever explicitly flying a flag to show any true belief system beyond self-preservation.
If you look at big companies in fields like oil, agriculture, and tobacco, and how they’ve made decisions based primarily on survival, no matter how 'evil’ they might appear to others, you’ll see a lot of parallels in Facebook. The difference is, unlike Facebook, those other companies never had a cuddly image to begin with.
You could argue that the brands currently boycotting Facebook only have their own spending in mind as they face down a recession, but the PR benefit they receive from taking part in the boycott shows how the public in the 21st century expects a moral backbone from the companies they engage with. Facebook’s failure to recognise this may yet com back to bite it.
One big read
The eye of the storm The eye of the storm
Political journalist Marie Le Conte writes a personal account of becoming the object of Twitter users’ hate, and how it’s changed her relationship with the platform.
One big tweet
Olivia Solon
Wondering how many tech workers have realized, in the absence of all the perks and corporate coddling they get on campus, that their company’s mission is meaningless
That’s all for today...
Back tomorrow with more.
Did you enjoy this issue?
 
Become a member for $5 per month
Don’t miss out on the other issues by Martin SFP Bryant
You can manage your subscription here
If you were forwarded this newsletter and you like it, you can subscribe here.
Powered by Revue