Meanwhile, I’m taking your feedback very seriously that many of you enjoy written content. So I decided to get back into the blogging arena.
The first post is about T 2764/19 (Header-embedded control data/STARKEY) of 11.6.2021 which deals with a situation that often occurs in patent prosecution:
Once prior art comes up which wasn’t known at the time of drafting, it may be that the remaining difference is much “leaner” than originally envisaged.
In particular, what if the remaining difference is completely arbitrary? Can it still be inventive?
Apart from this question, the board also makes some interesting remarks on the European claim construction standard, the question of incorporation by reference and the requirements on sufficiency of disclosure.
Here’s the full post: