View profile

Value vs. Worth (Part 3)

Value vs. Worth Part 1, Part 2.
Value vs. Worth (Part 3)
By Adam Draper • Issue #75 • View online
Value vs. Worth Part 1, Part 2.

It feels like people have pulled a full negative 180 on WeWork recently, or “We Company.” They are going public and everyone is focused on how it should be valued - as a tech company or a real estate company, with the assumption that technology companies have higher multiples than real estate, which is funny… shouldn’t it just be valued as a company that is growing x% a year?
My friend Scott Norton, who founded a condiment company (and would appreciate me evoking the curiosity of which condiment company), sent me an amazing video about valuation after writing my previous two posts:
Aswath Damodaran: "Valuation: Four Lessons to Take Away" | Talks at Google
Aswath Damodaran: "Valuation: Four Lessons to Take Away" | Talks at Google
It’s a long talk, but the most important piece to pull away is that “Great companies” can lose money, and be valued accurately and well, and that there are two valuation methods: numbers and stories, and both of those valuation methods are based on societies perception of them at the current moment.
There was a scientist in the 1900s - Francis Galton - who believed that the “herd” mentality of people, although can be associated with extremely irrational behavior and panic hysteria, can also provide a lot of value, so he bought an Ox, and had a crowd of people guess its weight (for a prize). The average guess of the crowd ended up being within 1 pound of the real weight of the Ox.
I think valuations live somewhere between humanity’s irrational brain and the wisdom of the crowds.
Did you enjoy this issue?
Adam Draper

I ponder as a VC.

It's a quick one minute read to make you think, smile, or laugh.

If you don't want these updates anymore, please unsubscribe here.
If you were forwarded this newsletter and you like it, you can subscribe here.
Powered by Revue