View profile

IOP Observatory – Breaking the Law, Unbundling, and Fundamental Truths

Revue
 
Here we are again. Another edition of the Observatory. What with all the politics and end-of-year hur
 
December 15 · Issue #7 · View online
The VUCA Observatory
Here we are again. Another edition of the Observatory. What with all the politics and end-of-year hurry, this lay dormant for unforgivably long. But at last, my observations on the network transformation.
In this edition: Breaking the Law, Unbundling, and Fundamental Truths.
Feel free to forward this to a friend.
Referred by a friend? Sign up!

Wearables and Devices
Pebble, a pioneer in the smart watch market, agreed to sell it’s IP assets to Fitbit for reportedly $40m, not enough to fulfil its debt obligations. Fitbit on its own is facing immense struggles in the Wearables market, as exhibited in its latest quarterly filing[2] which shows CAC through the roof. Which, of course, leads the punditry regiment to declare the death of the gadget.[3] If you’re so inclined, you can read that as bundling/unbundling theory. 
Department of Trends
Case in point: Benedict Evans’ update on “Mobile is Eating the World”[1]. Chris Anderson famously called the explosion of Hardware Products the “peace dividend of the smartphone wars”,[2] and Evans is driving home the point: we’re now looking at the next abstraction layer. What happens with Smartphones and their components as foundation. And yet, humans are stubborn. That’s why Rebekah Cox’s piece resonated. [3] If you’re working in tech and human behaviour, this is required reading. 
Transportation and Breaking the Law
Cory Doctorow wrote a compelling piece of near-future fiction for an Australian University, detailing what unanticipated effects Autonomous Vehicles might have.[1] At the same time, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation published a good overview of where we already are in connected vehicles.[2] In the meantime, Tesla’s numbers show that Self-Driving safety doesn’t quite live up to the hype[3] while Uber again touts the law as they introduce self-driving service in San Francisco, promptly violating traffic laws.[4] Of course this is Ubers MO - ignore regulation to grow fast enough - and the same strategy that OTTO, the autonomous trucking firm Uber bought, pursued in Nevada.[5]
Strange and Interesting
That’s it for this week.
If you have feedback, please let me know at martin@internetofpeople.eu
Found something that should go into this? Send it my way!
Did you enjoy this issue?
If you don't want these updates anymore, please unsubscribe here
If you were forwarded this newsletter and you like it, you can subscribe here
Powered by Revue