Greylock invested $3 million in AppDynamicsâ Series A round funding, returning $300 million, or 100x after it exited. They subsequently invested another $20 million in Series B through Series F rounds, for a 14.5x return. The disparity between the two accounts highlights the huge difference in returns between investing early in startups and in later rounds ~>Â
Questioning the conventional wisdom of the reserve fund
Albert Wenger argues that the funds that will do best are the ones that remain disciplined in size and also are looking actively for the next wave of innovation. He believes that the most promising candidates in terms of innovation are blockchains and hard sciences (especially in medicine, but also materials, energy and possibly space) ~>Â
Venture Capital is a Capacity Industry with Boom and Bust Cycles
Alex Taussig of Lightspeed Venture Partners argues:Â Instead of disqualifying entrepreneurs by their choice of a career path, we should affirm that there is no âone pathâ to building a company ~>Â
Letâs put this myth about MBAs to bed
TrueBridge published the Brink List â a shortlist of investors who have been making a name for themselves in VC and are poised to break into the Midas ranks in the near future ~>Â
The 2017 Midas Brink List (Quite literally, the future of VCâŠ)Â
Thus, while the common story is that active fund managers struggle to beat the S&P 500, or perhaps the U.S. stock market overall (the tale that the Journal told), the victory for indexing extends far more widely than that. Across the board, in every category that the SPIVA paper examined, the benchmark triumphed for the 15-year period. There were no exceptions. ~>Â
One Very Big Strike Against Active Management