View profile

Friday Edition: A win for abortion rights in Kansas

The Preface
Friday Edition: A win for abortion rights in Kansas
By Samuel Wonacott • Issue #38 • View online

The Takeaway: In long awaited ruling, Kansas Supreme Court says state constitution protects abortion
The Kansas Supreme Court on Friday bolstered the campaign to protect and expand abortion rights at the state level, ruling the Kansas Constitution leaves the decision to terminate a pregnancy with the mother.
The decision is an encouraging one for abortion-rights groups, many of which have turned their focus from national politics to the states over the last few years, fearful that a conservative-leaning Supreme Court could one day overturn Roe v. Wade.
The Kansas Supreme Court decision ensures that abortion would remain legal in Kansas if the Supreme Court overturned the 1973 case that vitiated many state and federal restrictions on abortion.
In 2015, the Kansas legislature passed, and the governor signed, Senate Bill 95, which prohibited doctors from performing dilation and evacuation (known as D&E), the conventional method of abortion during the second trimester.
A trial court issued an injunction against the law at the behest of a group of Kansas doctors, who argued dilation and evacuation was the safest method of abortion during the second trimester. The Kansas Attorney General and District Attorney General for Johnson Country countered that the doctors’ complaint was moot, since there was no right to an abortion under the Kansas Constitution.
In handing down its decision, the Kansas Supreme Court found that the right to personal autonomy, protected by the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights, includes the right to end a pregnancy.
“Although not absolute, this right is fundamental,” the Court wrote. “Accordingly, the State is prohibited from restricting this right unless it is doing so to further a compelling government interest and in a way that is narrowly tailored to that interest.”
According to the Guttmacher Institute, a sexual and reproductive health research organization, states have enacted 21 abortion restrictions in 2019, including bans on abortion after 18 weeks and "trigger” bans that would immediately prohibit abortion if Roe v. Wade were overturned.
Pro-choice advocates have argued that abortion restrictions don’t reduce abortions, but some research indicates that might not always be true. A recent study by the National Bureau of Economic Research found that parental involvement laws enacted before the mid-1990s reduced abortion rates among minors by 15% to 20%.
Scoops and Tidings
Obama Had a Green New Deal, and It Worked. Let’s Do That Again - New York Magazine
Sean Hannity Went Soft on President Trump - The Atlantic
Anita Hill on Joe Biden: the 1991 Clarence Thomas hearing was not fair - The Washington Post
Her Ex Was the Wanted Man. So Why Did This Mom Spend Easter Weekend in Jail? – Reason Magazine
Longform Read of the Week
Did you enjoy this issue?
Samuel Wonacott

The Preface brings you daily news and thoughtful writing from across the political spectrum.

If you don't want these updates anymore, please unsubscribe here.
If you were forwarded this newsletter and you like it, you can subscribe here.
Powered by Revue
Boise, ID