Yet another glitch. So many glitches and software that snitches. CCTV and Genuity. đź
|
October 4 · Issue #102 · View online |
|
Yet another glitch. So many glitches and software that snitches. CCTV and Genuity. đź
|
|
|
Airbnb glitch exposed hosts' personal data | IT PRO
The company has blamed a âtechnical issueâ for the leak that saw hostsâ data made available to others
|
|
|
Workplace surveillance has rapidly morphed into home-workplace surveillance.
|
David Heinemeier Hansson, a co-founder of the collaboration startup Basecamp, which provides a software platform for companies to coordinate their remote workers, says he regularly has to turn down requests from potential clients for new methods of spying on their employees.
|
Shirking from home? Staff feel the heat as bosses ramp up remote surveillance | World news | The Guardian
As management seeks more oversight of workers away from the office, campaigners fight for privacy to be respected
|
Thereâs subtlety in choosing a name for your company and then thereâs this -
|
Another company called Sneek offers technology that takes photos of workers through their laptop and uploads them for colleagues to see.
|
'I monitor my staff with software that takes screenshots' - BBC News
Many have struggled to get to grips with working from home, but would surveillance technology help?
|
|
âThis document reveals a shocking misuse of personal health information by police,â said CCF Litigation Director, Christine Van Geyn. âPolice were caught using the COVID-19 database to look up names unrelated to active calls, to do wholesale postal code searches for COVID-19 cases, and to even do broad based searches outside officersâ own cities. There is no rationale for this abuse. We have filed a complaint with the Ontario Privacy Commissioner for violations of the Personal Health Information Protection Act, and with the Ontario Independent Police Review Director for officer misconduct.â
|
Documents reveal details of Ontario police misuse of COVID-19 database | Canadian Constitution Foundation
TORONTO: The Canadian Constitution Foundation (CCF) is releasing a document obtained through Freedom of Information legislation that outline specific details of police services misuse of a COVID-19 da
|
|
|
While weâre on the topic of police and personal data, two peculiar and concerning issues relating to Garda access to and sharing of personal data cropped up this week. Galway City mayor Mike Cubbard was quoted in the Irish Times as saying that âThe gardaĂ have agreed to work with the college and give them addresses of houses where they have been called because of parties, and then the college will make contact with landlords".
|
|
As Liam Herrick of the ICCL says, âItâs not clear that there is a lawful basis for guards passing on information that does not relate to criminal offences.â
|
|
|
Two and a bit years later the efforts of the New Ross councillors to overturn the most significant piece of European data protection legislation in a generation have come to naught. Since this was well within what could be called the bedding-in period for the new legislation a certain amount of confusion could be understood as natural while people and organisations became accustomed to the new law.
|
The bedding-in and acclimatisation period has long since passed. Yet the impulse to reverse, rewrite, overturn or what have you has not gone away. It has, in fact, found its way upwards from local government chambers into the national parliament, expressed this week by An Taoiseach himself.
|
MicheĂĄl Martin: âIn my view, privacy rights should not apply to people who are dumping illegally and if legislation is required to correct this, then it will be brought about urgently. I spoke to the Minister this morning. I understand the need for privacy and for property rights to be protected. On the other hand, we can overdo this. I think CCTV should be used to catch illegal dumpers and to prosecute them, and there should be no issue around that.â
|
|
|
A decision had been issued to Kerry County Council, which is being appealed.
|
[The] decision was issued by the Commissioner in March 2020 and concerned Kerry County Council. It found that certain CCTV systems operated by Kerry County Council were unlawful in the absence of authorisation from the Garda Commissioner under Section 38 of An Garda SĂochĂĄna Act 2005. Significantly in this regard, the Litter Pollution Act 1997, the Waste Management Act 1996 (as amended), and the Local Government Act 2001 were comprehensively considered and the decision found that those Acts do not provide a lawful basis for the use of CCTV for law enforcement purposes. [page 38]
|
|
Yet this week we have the Taoiseach ignoring the multiple DPC investigations and decisions and proposing to legislate his way around a European regulation. This is the Irish stateâs all too common knee-jerk response to laws it doesnât like. Rarely considered is the fact that any national law introduced which will restrict the rights of individuals has to be necessary, proportionate and demonstrably effective at achieving its aims.
|
|
Questioned during a weekend visit to the Fleadh Cheoil na hĂireann in Drogheda, the Taoiseach said: âThere will need to be some changes around the retention of data, transparency and strengthening the legal basis of the Public Services Card.â One of the issues the Government will soon address is the deletion of retained data on cardholders, he added.
|
This wasnât a bad suggestion at all. Rather than relying on painstakingly combing through existing legislation to search for sentences which look as if they might provide something that gives the appearance of a lawful basis a brand new Public Services Card Bill could have been put forward.
|
Curiously enough, this idea was dropped within days and hasnât been seen again since. Perhaps because there was a realisation somewhere within the corridors of power that any such legislation which aimed to maintain the PSC system in its current against-all-best-practice-advice manifestation would fail the necessity and proportionality tests.
|
|
It definitely could.
|
The message came out of the blue for Taylor Fornell. A stranger told her he had complete control over the home security system in her new house in Stony Plain, Alta., and could prove it. As she stood alone in her front hall, she watched in disbelief as the man unarmed the system, unlocked doors and windows and told her he could track when she left the house â all with a few clicks on the security companyâs app.
|
|
|
|
The company was fined despite cooperating fully, apologising to the affected employees and agreeing to pay them considerable compensation. In the absence of these mitigating measures it is possible the amount of the fine could have been considerably larger since H&Mâs turnover for the preceding year was âŹ21.9 billion.
|
|
|
|
|
-
âFarrell notes two particular problems with smart cities, the first being that there is no way to opt-out of having your data collected. She says, âYou canât opt-out of Trafalgar Square, you canât opt-out of buying food. So⌠the whole opt-out regime, it just doesnât work.â The second problem, according to Farrell, is that smart cities are often built with public-private contracts. She claims the companies behind these contracts âare a long way away down a chain from any kind of public accountability and are [working on] smart cities basically because theyâre an incredible opportunity to vacuum up vast amounts of data.â From âBalancing Technological Advances and Data Privacyâ, a short discussion with Maria Farrell on the Salzburg Global Seminar site.
- The EDRi published a new booklet, âData Retention Revisitedâ written by researchers Melinda Rucz and Sam Kloosterboer from the Information Law and Policy Lab in the Netherlands. "Data Retention Revisited explores the history of data retention in Europe, the legal framework and the impact of data retention practices on fundamental rights. This includes the intrusiveness of metadata and the stifling effects on freedom of expression. It explores how necessity and proportionately fit into data retention practices (including voluntary ones), as well as its effectiveness (is mass surveillance even useful?) showcasing problems such as false positives and âtechnological solutionismâ.â Meanwhile, across on the other other side of town the Council of the European Union has set up an âAd-hoc Working Party on Data Retentionâ [PDF].
- Last but not least, the investigation by Noteworthy and The Business Post into the artists formerly known as Genomics Medicine Ireland is published today. The main Noteworthy piece is here, with many links to further items. The Business Post piece is here (âŹ).
â
|
|
|
If you know someone who might enjoy this newsletter do please forward it on to them.
|
Did you enjoy this issue?
|
|
|
|
If you don't want these updates anymore, please unsubscribe here.
If you were forwarded this newsletter and you like it, you can subscribe here.
|
|
Privacy Kit, Made with đ in Dublin, Ireland
|